a not-for-profit corporation   
PO Box 424    Kinderhook NY  12106    518-758-2646   

 
WIDEWATERS COMMONS WIDEWATERS DEIS WIDEWATERS SDEIS ROUNDABOUT KNGG FINDINGS ARTICLE 78 ABOUT KNGG MEMBERSHIP KNGG CONCERT BENEFIT KNGG Home Page
PAST ISSUES Home Page
 
ROUNDABOUT
 
MEDIA Letters

The letters on this on this page are listed in date order with the latest appearing at the top. 

                                       The earliest letter can be located at the bottom.

Rt 9 Corridor Study



Frustrated Motorist

To the Editor:

This afternoon I spent some quality time with my husband trapped in the new roundabout at the intersection of Route 9/9H and State Farm Road. 

     I would like five minutes alone with the geniuses who decided this project would be a good idea.

     If their goal was to create confused, frustrated drivers and an extremely hazardous situation, then they have succeeded admirably.

     We will avoid this area in the future at all cost.

Donna Connors, Greenport NY

-- -- The Register-Star, Friday September 30, 2005


The following appeared in:

The Independent - July 2, 2004 - Letters to the Editor and
The Register-Star - July 7, 2004 as an EDITORIAL
by KNGG President, Allen Schaefer
To The Editor
The Register-Star editorial of June 21, “The roundabout is the best way to go,” is simply the opinion of the editor and is in no way based on research or facts. In fact what the editor says is wrong and misleading. Apparently he is not familiar with the Kinderhook intersection under discussion. If he were, he would recognize there are grave safety and traffic congestion issues that make this roundabout the wrong thing for the town and its residents.

 

The Widewaters Group wants to build a strip mall at the very busy four-legged intersection of US9/NY 9H, which is currently signalized. The unsignalized roundabout has been proposed by DOT as a “mitigation measure” for the extra traffic this commercial development will generate.  In addition the mall’s entrance would necessitate a fifth leg for roundabout. The town of Kinderhook can turn down this roundabout. The determination is in its hands, not the hands of DOT.

While New York State DOT appears currently to be infatuated with the concept of roundabouts as a one-size-fits-all, flavor of-the month solution, roundabouts in no way are the answer for every intersection.  Kinderhook Neighbors for Good Growth (KNGG) have carefully scrutinized the impact of the proposed roundabout, sponsoring two separate expert evaluations of it from the reputable traffic-engineering firms, Vollmer Associates of Albany and CDM of Wethersfield, Connecticut. These studies show that the roundabout is a bad idea for this site. (See the results of those studies on our web site, www.kngg.org under “ROUNDABOUT.”)
    
Roundabouts can work when they are in the right place. But this one cannot be justified as workable, safe or having the longevity the developer has claimed.  [The Kinderhook Town Planning Board must require Widewaters to post an appropriate bond to be used to restudy growing traffic conditions and also to put money aside to rebuild the roundabout if necessary.  (For longevity issues see www.kngg.org ROUNDABOUT “Moran Evaluation.”)]

The dangers and hazards posed by the proposed roundabout cannot be overstated. The Ichabod Crane School System with 2,500 students, plus faculty and support staff, is almost opposite the strip mall’s proposed site. The students will be attracted to the mall all day every day. They and other pedestrians will try to cross the two major highways and four lanes of traffic. But the traffic exiting the roundabout has no yield signs as it accelerates to higher speeds, thus making conditions for pedestrians more hazardous than previously recognized. The safety factor of the school is an extremely important issue and still has not been adequately addressed.

If this roundabout should be built, yield signs at its five different entrances will replace the existing traffic signals. This means there will be no breaks in the moving traffic. . DOT’s only concern appears to be how to keep vehicular traffic moving.  But the school busses entering and exiting school grounds will have a hard time navigating. How will the school busses enter and exit the school grounds, for example?


At a special meeting for Widewaters on April 21, Kinderhook Planning Board member Gerald Minot-Scheuerman pointed out to DOT engineer Howard McCulloch that existing traffic already makes it hard to turn left from Maple Lane South, Maple Lane North or Herrick Road on to US9 northbound. Drivers need the signal to change at the US9/9H intersection to find a break in the traffic in order to make a left turn. The proposed roundabout will make it almost impossible to turn on to US9 from the side roads because when the traffic signals are removed from the US9/NY 9H intersection, the essential break in the traffic will not occur. If the roundabout works as DOT predicts, it will keep traffic moving constantly. Since there would be a similar situation will exist at the US9 and Main Street intersection in Valatie, Scheuerman asked McCulloch how he planned to solve such problems.


McCulloch, who as designer, is vested in the project, replied: "I don’t know. My focus is on the roundabout." But it is McCulloch’s responsibility as designer of this roundabout, and DOT’s responsibility, to make absolutely sure that all five legs of the roundabout will work. We believe that McCulloch’s answer is simply irresponsible to the public. All parties must stringently analyze The US9/NY 9H corridor as a whole, not just as one intersection. McCulloch has not examined anything beyond the immediate US9/NY 9H intersection to prepare his roundabout design. He did not know where the nearby Keegan Road intersection is, nor did he know that it is signalized.  If it is so important to the DOT to see this roundabout built, this agency should provide the Town of Kinderhook with a detailed corridor study.


At the April 21 Planning Board meeting McCulloch theorized that large trucks, oversized loads (and school busses) traveling south on US9 to enter the roundabout would bear left into the new left lane and yield just before entering. At this point, cars and other vehicles headed for the mall or NY 9H south would bear into the right lane. As the vehicles in both left and right lanes determine the coast is clear they would follow the road lane stripes into their destined lanes.


But McCulloch explained that the trailer truck in the left lane would not be able to navigate the turn through the roundabout toUS9 southbound without using the two lanes. The inner apron, designed to help larger vehicles navigate the circle, has been removed to accommodate the new second lane.


Most drivers assume that if the lines on the road are painted to define the two parallel lanes, one should be able to travel safely within his or her chosen lane, driving south to NY 9H. BUT if people do this, the truck driver in the left lane, due to his blind spots, will probably not see the vehicle in the right lane and would collide with it as the truck swings over the line into the right lane. McCulloch says that the truck would have the right of way. This dangerous situation is caused by the two-lane part of the roundabout for the developer’s purpose.

To serve the best interests of our citizens and to protect children, teachers, and drivers, the Planning Board must put the best interests of the Town at heart and turn down this roundabout.  It would change the character of the Town and is not what is intended by the Comprehensive Plan.


 

FOR ANOTHER VIEW OF THE KINDERHOOK PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT
THE LETTER BELOW

 

The following letter appeared in:
The Chatham Courier - July 1, 2004
The Independent - July 6, 2004
The Register-Star - July 6, 2004
 

To the Editor:

July 3, 2004

It's bad enough that the Widewaters land exploitation group chose the most visually beautiful open-to-the-public viewshed in Columbia County (NY) to construct its "new commercial center of Kinderhook," which is in essence a strip mall with outbuildings.   But Widewaters disgraceful defense of their choice -- that those who pass by on Route 9 only see this spectacular view for eleven seconds anyway -- shows even less respect and concern for our people and community.

 

In response to a comprehensive plan questionnaire some years ago, the overwhelming majority of Kinderhookers recommended that the town preserve this very special location as open space.  The people of our town well understand that this site helps to define Kinderhook's unique place in Hudson Valley history.  They know it's an important visual resource for our tourist economy, the "unmatchable asset we should be promoting," in the words of Walter Kulash, nationally recognized and reform-minded traffic engineer. 

 

Tech Valley Magazine, a publication of the Albany-Colonie Chamber of Commerce, with which Columbia County is affiliated, is luring the best businesses it can find to our area.  The Chamber notes that "while the aggressive marketing, tax incentives and diversity of businesses are getting high-tech companies to notice Tech Valley, it is the quality of life that gets them to locate to this area of "natural beauty and recreational opportunities."  Are we to remain a positive part of this program or not?  If so, Kinderhook’s planners must do the planning and not leave it to developers.

 

Because the planned strip mall’s buildings would be placed close to Route 9, which in turn would be twisted into a don't-stop roundabout, this site will be visually stolen from us forever.  Why won't Widewaters choose another developable site on Rte. 9 and make those of us who love it here happy?  The name of our town is Kinderhook, not Widewatersville.

 

Frankly, I'd rather stop at a traffic light and take in a wonderful view of the Catskill Mountain for 30 seconds than thread my way through a roundabout.  I do not consider that wait to be a "level of service" failure; I consider it to be the reason we stay in this gorgeous area.

 

Urban roundabouts are generally thought of by state DOTs and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, as not appropriate for urban areas because of their high volume of auto and pedestrian traffic.  And make no mistake about it, when development takes off, this will be an urban area.  Think Greenport.  Think East Greenbush, routes 4 and 20.  

 

Christchurch, New Zealand, as reported in its City Manager's Office Report, vetoed a roundabout because it was felt that the number of accidents would be the same, as it would increase the volume of through traffic on local neighborhood side streets, resulting in no net decrease in the number of accidents; it would simply relocate the problem.  Who is planning for Maple Lane traffic?

 

Remember winter?  The 8/19/02 Anchorage Daily News reports the removal of a roundabout because some vehicles spun out of control as they exited, resulting in accidents which caused the loss of five light poles in one year at $4-5,000 a pop.

 

Davis, CA, turned down a roundabout because of problems which reduced the effective capacity of the intersection, including acute angles of entry, just like 9H, which would only accommodate large trucks if the center island were small and completely mountable, "not a desirable condition as it will eliminate the use of (directional) signs in the center of the island, adding to driver confusion," and "would eliminate all landscaping."  Other similar problems were "long, straight sections of roadway leading into deceptively sharp curves and odd-shaped islands;"  "sharp turning radii into exits;"  "poor sight distance at the entry point." 

 

Emergency vehicles?  Kansas State Firefighters Assoc. reports that Kansas won't put roundabouts on major routes because the large emergency vehicles, whose turning radii are wide, forces drivers to "take the left side of the circle and drive against traffic to make a 90 degree turn."

 

"TheChamplainChannel.com, 4/28/04, reports, "One problem:  Some vehicles...like this ambulance we watched, couldn't make it through the first time around.  Fire trucks might not make it at all...But city engineers say 'not to worry...We didn't landscape the center circle, so that if a very large truck does come down through here he can jump the curb...'  Now that's logical.  Build something they can't use, and then say it doesn't matter." 

 

A rather scary tight squeeze for the other vehicles in the circle, too.  They can't they pull over to get out of the way, and trucks will have the right of way in the circle, according to NYSDOT. 

 

Who is liable for an accident caused by bad design?  A 6/02 study for the Santa Barbara Taxpayers Association points out the problems of legality: "...as un-regulated intersection, accident responsibility is difficult to assign.  This difficulty exists because vehicles are not required to stop.  Right of way determination is at best difficult to determine.  Accident rates often increase after installation of a roundabout...no reports are made unless there are injuries or at least one vehicle (is) damaged so badly it was un-drivable and had to be towed." 

 

The study concludes, "It appears that a common tactic by those in favor of roundabouts is to dismiss the expense and other objectionable factors related to them.  They then pick an intersection that is in need of long overdue maintenance, and possibly has other factors contributing to hazardous traffic operation such as improper signalization.  Multiple options are then presented, all of which include a variation of what they want and leave out other reasonable alternatives...Traffic volume and relative speeds are more important factors in the likelihood of accidents than any other element...The paramount problem with the current intersection analysis is that it is pre-occupied with time delays. 

 

"The level of service (LOS) approach grades intersections on an A through F scale based entirely on delay, i.e., whether queues develop, and at signalized intersections whether all waiting vehicles 'clear' the intersection in one or more signal cycles, and how many seconds they must wait.  This approach fails to consider safety, comfort and convenience factors, non-reported accidents, new accidents, fear and road rage incidents."

 

Who do you trust when DOT seems to answer a question two ways?  One lane is safer, but you have to plan for two lanes for future growth?  And the entrances and exits from a single-lane roundabout must be wide enough for two lanes, which immediately maximizes the points of conflict within the circle?  People will drive courteously, obey the striped markings on the pavement and will stay in their correct lane, yet they can't be trusted to slow down for a traffic light? 

 

Roundabout "expert" Georges Jacquemart says in his 8/16/02 "Draft Guidelines on Accessible Public Rights-of-Way," Safety versus Ease of Use, "(R)oundabouts…do not lull users into an exaggerated sense of security as traffic lights do. At traffic lights users get very simple messages (walk, don't walk, green, red), and unfortunately users associate this simplicity with safety. At roundabouts all users are asked to pay attention and often users perceive this as unsafe."

 

Drivers, we're told, won't gun out of a roundabout exit because they're "not supposed to," yet half the pedestrian crosswalks would be at the point just beyond the roundabout exit, exactly where your foot comes down hard to accelerate back to the speed limit.

 

When so many traffic engineers warn us that a roundabout is not always the best answer for every intersection, that is the information Kinderhook should be listening to. 

 

Diane Whelton

Kinderhook, NY  12106


Plattsburgh, NY
May 1, 2004


News

 

Shape of things to come or road to ruin?

Editor’s note: The Press-Republican asked readers to tell us what they think about the City of Plattsburgh’s first roundabout, located at the intersection of Rugar Street, George Angell Drive and Prospect Avenue in front of Plattsburgh High School.

Here are all the responses:

"I feel the roundabout is not the answer to the problem on Rugar Street/Angell Drive. I find it confusing and adding to the congestion.

"Also, how is the city going to maneuver a plow through in winter?

— Geraldine Maliniak, Plattsburgh

"As a former Plattsburgh High School student, I am well aware of the "traffic problems" in the front of the High School. I don’t see this roundabout as resolving the underlying problem at that intersection anyway.

"The problem with the intersection isn’t traffic volume; it’s the concentration of inexperienced drivers in that one location at certain periods of time.

"Little to no traffic enters the intersection from Prospect Avenue, and Angell Drive only experiences traffic in the morning and afternoon. I’m not sure when exactly this intersection became the biggest traffic concern in the city, but traffic congestion just doesn’t exist in this intersection to merit such drastic changes like a roundabout or traffic light."

— Mark Tiffer, Plattsburgh

"I just purchased a house in the city. I think the roundabout was a well-meaning idea, but the construction of it is a little off.

"I see trucks turning down Leonard Avenue instead, and that street is residential that previously saw no tractor-trailers. I think the types of traffic that goes through that intersection were not considered fully.

"The lanes are a bit too narrow. The dividers going in should be smaller for the lane to be wider and the actually roundabout itself a little smaller to allow the bigger trucks to go through.

"They say you can drive on it if you have to, but would you think that way if you were to approach it?"

— Lynn King, Plattsburgh

"Many thanks to the Press-Republican for providing an opportunity to Plattsburgh residents to express an opinion about the roundabouts. For the record, the roundabouts are not safe or efficient — and the diagonal parking is a ridiculous idea."

— Claire Goineau, Plattsburgh

"I do not feel as though the roundabout on Rugar Street is effectively working. It does slow people down, but more than anything, I think it causes confusion.

"I can’t imagine what would happen if a fire truck or tractor-trailer truck had to go over or maneuver through this intersection. It appears that it would be dangerous.

"I do agree that fender-benders should be less severe, simply because the confusion causes everyone to slow or stop.

"I say get rid of it and put in four-way stop signs."

— Bette Durocher, Plattsburgh

"Who the heck thought this one up? My wife and I went to check this roundabout out Saturday morning. We almost got hit by a pickup truck that didn’t yield the right of way. Not that this is anything new, as far too many drivers in this area don’t pay attention to road signs.

"I couldn’t believe how narrow the roadway is going around the center island. Why would anyone in their right mind put something in the middle of the road that has to be driven over by anything larger than a mid-size vehicle?

"Furthermore, there isn’t any escape path to take in order to avoid a collision. Defensive driving is all but ruled out. Where is one to go with only three-quarters of a lane to work with?

"A better solution would be to rework the entire intersection and control it with traffic lights. Of course, we would probably have to wait till the appropriate number of people are killed or seriously maimed before that would happen."

— Jim Morris, Plattsburgh

"STUPID. Money would be better spent on street repair."

— Former Mayor John L. Ianelli, Plattsburgh

"I would like to give my comments on the new roundabout on Rugar Street.

"I go through that intersection every morning around 7:30 a.m., which is one of the times traffic can be the worst there. Although I used to have to wait to turn right off George Angell Drive, I preferred that to this new arrangement.

"I have been through roundabouts in other larger cities, and I have two problems with this one:

"1. The intersection is too small for a roundabout. The circle is too tight when going all the way around. When turning right or going straight, it really is no different than it was before.

"2. Drivers are not using it correctly. Most people traveling on Rugar Street keep going the way they always have, rather than yielding the way they are supposed to.

"In my opinion, it is an accident waiting to happen. A traffic light would make much more sense."

— Laura Stevens, Morrisonville

"I’m in Plattsburgh all the time, and I hate the roundabout. I avoid the roundabout because I find that people don’t know what to do, and that makes it dangerous. I just don’t feel safe."

— Renate Peterson, Saranac Lake

"I don’t see where there’s a necessity to have it there. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

"If they put future roundabouts in — I don’t see a need for it in the city — like Broad and North Catherine, it would be a disaster. There’s way too much traffic. It’ll be like a ‘step on the gas and try to squeeze in’."

— Mark Finnell, Cadyville

"I used to use that back way to go to the mall. I try to avoid it now.

"If there’s even one or two cars there, it’s a mess. When school is letting out, it’s much worse. Just getting through it is a pain.

"I don’t know what they’re going to do when it’s time to plow."

— Pete Jock, Plattsburgh

"I use that strip for everything. The original idea was to slow down traffic, I believe. The intersection has a lot of traffic, especially when school gets out.

"I used that street all the time and never had any problem with drivers.

"I just can’t wait for winter to see how the plows will keep those very narrow arteries clean; it’s going to be an absolute disaster.

"This may be rumor, but I heard the engineer who came here to design the roundabouts doesn’t even own a vehicle.

"As far as having a fire truck trying to make the curves, I think it’s the most insane thing I’ve ever seen.

"Someone at the top must think we’re like Syracuse or Buffalo. This is a small town, and people have been navigating the streets with no problem."

— Roland J. Fredette, Plattsburgh

"I hate it. Basically, I think it’s an accident waiting to happen. It seems like no one knows what to do there, and everybody is tentative.

"I hope they don’t keep it. I’m trying to figure out a way to avoid it. I hate to go that way because I don’t feel comfortable."

Julie Parada, Morrisonville

"I thought the Post Office (Miller Street) parking was a little ridiculous, but the roundabout is totally ridiculous — a tragedy.

"Our tax dollars are being wasted. Our taxes keep going up, and we wonder why."

— Robert Thompson, Plattsburgh

"I used to have a moving business; I drove tractor- trailers. I don’t know how I’d get around that circle. No matter the size of the curb, it would be very hard on the tires when you have a full load. Tires for big trucks are expensive. I don’t think it’s fair to the companies that have to make deliveries through there.

"We have a police force; put someone out there, and when you catch someone speeding, up those fines.

"It’s (the roundabout) a hazard."

— Isadore Defayette, Plattsburgh

"It’s tough to get tractor-trailers around it. To maneuver a 43-foot tractor-trailer around the circle is virtually impossible. It will probably damage the circle and will cause damage to vehicles."

— Robin Weeden, Plattsburgh, manager of Crowley Foods

"It’s a bad idea. I used the one near the school — I don’t know how you use them, too narrow. (City Councilor) Jack Stewart said the mayor should listen to the people (on roundabouts)."

— Gary Sargeant, Plattsburgh

"If I’ve got a bike, do I become a car? If you’re walking, is the pedestrian allowed to cross? How could a fire truck ever get straight without going across the roundabout?

— Ruth Kramer, Plattsburgh

"Good but too small."

— Tim McCormick, Cliff Haven

"They should have put in an all-way stop or a light. It’s a mess."

— Jane Houghton, Plattsburgh

"I think the roundabout makes the intersection awkward, instead of the yield. There should be a four-way stop without the crap in the middle of the road."

Stephanie Rhoades, Plattsburgh

"I’m totally against it. They’re very dangerous."

— Clyde Cook, Peru

"It’s too small. I never heard anything so ridiculous as having trucks roll over it. It strikes me as nonsense.

"If the city can’t make it larger, they should forget about it."

— Joan Janson, Plattsburgh

"Personally being a fisherman, a boater, this is an atrocious thing, this roundabout up by Angel Drive."

— Wayne Wilkins, Plattsburgh

"I think it’s dangerous. A fire truck went by yesterday, and he (the driver) had to go over the roundabout."

— Alan Garrant, Plattsburgh

"I’ve lived in other places where they had them; I’ve always liked them. I work at the school, so I have to use this one every day.

"The buildup we used to have on George Angel Drive has pretty much evaporated. There used to be up to a 20-minute wait some afternoons when school got out. Now there’s virtually no wait; traffic seems to move right along, and those are the pluses.

"It is a little small; it could be bigger. The other thing that needs to be done is education. People don’t know how to use them. There needs to be more education of how they’re used. I’d like to see more of them in Plattsburgh."

Steve Graf, Plattsburgh

"The construction of the so-called roundabout by PHS is an engineering nightmare. The road isn’t wide enough to accommodate an authentic roundabout, and it is cumbersome for cars to maneuver around it, let alone trucks and other larger vehicles.

"I understand that the traffic flow during certain times of the day at that intersection is heavy, but this idea (a bad one at that) is definitely not the solution.

"Although we live in Peru, we use Rugar Street and find attempting to navigate this sorry excuse for a roundabout to be difficult and disconcerting."

— Jim and Carol Ruscoe, Peru

"This is a great idea except the circle needs to be three times larger than it is if its intended purpose is to handle traffic volume more efficiently.

"With the circle being so small, traffic cannot flow freely from four directions, and you end up with nothing more than a four-way-stop intersection. Great for reducing speeds, but bad for reducing vehicular congestion.

"Traffic planners should also realize that traffic circles are not pedestrian friendly! Putting one in front of a school is probably not a good idea unless more than one crossing guard is assigned to address pedestrian safety issues."

— Tim Meschinelli, Plattsburgh

"The roundabout can’t be for real! It’s as bad as the wrong-way angle parking.

"Maybe the city leaders need to visit some other cities to see the right way to manage a growing city. If you can’t do something right, don’t waste money getting it wrong."

— Al Johnson, West Chazy

"I think the roundabout is completely ridiculous. Is this the city trying to pretend it’s a metropolis or what? C’mon, Plattsburgh does not need a roundabout. It just doesn’t work for such a small community. Roundabouts require lots of space to work effectively. Somebody make it stop! Please! I’m getting dizzy just thinking about it."

— Jody Leavens, Plattsburgh

"The roundabout makes little, if any, sense. At a time when the city has already raised every tax and fee and rate, we can not afford the extra expense.

"The idea that large trucks, etc., can drive over it is insane. We are supposed to have roads on which to drive, not curbs to drive over.

"This is another example of officials in our city government insisting on doing what they want rather than listening to the folks who elected them."

— Robert Cavanaugh, Plattsburgh

"The roundabout pathway to an accident is considered a headache in Buffalo, NY. Drivers in western New York have for years tried to eliminate the circles in the middle of McKinley Parkway.

"Confusion, frustration and accidents have been the only things heightened around the turns. The circles, however, in Buffalo are much wider than the one on Rugar Street.

"This issue will lead to more confusion if not higher insurance premiums. I don’t commend the city at all for this decision."

— S. Mayer

"I discovered the round intersection last week and had no trouble navigating it. However, I grew up in Massachusetts and learned to drive where "rotaries" were just part of the landscape. There is seldom a problem unless people treat the YIELD sign as a full stop. However, most of those Massachusetts circles have two lanes, not just one as on Rugar Street.

"It is helpful to slow a bit as you approach the circle and to time your merging to fit the speed and spacing of other vehicles going around. Perhaps at rush hour that would be somewhat tricky, but there’s no reason to worry if drivers have to wait a bit before easing into the circular traffic.

"People here should be able to get used to it, unlike the out-of-staters who panic and jam things up waiting to enter the large rotaries at the bridges to Cape Cod!"

— Jan Forsman

"I would like to put in my two cents on the roundabout. I come from Australia where they use roundabouts throughout all of Queensland, and they are very successful. My husband and I have used them on visits and find them very safe.

"My husband, David, says that the only fault he has with the Rugar Street one is that it is too small. But we all learn by our mistakes, and hopefully they will try again at some time."

Jackie and David Nisoff, Morrisonville

"The roundabout on Rugar Street might work better if, instead of physical barriers, the lanes and roundabout were painted on the road. This would make it easier for large trucks and emergency vehicles to negotiate the roundabout and still guide vehicles around. This works well in England.

"People just have to learn the new traffic pattern and in time will come to like the way traffic flows. They do work very well."

— Vivienne Degen

"It would make more sense to have a traffic light at this busy intersection than this crazy maze you have created. Whose thought was it?"

Lillian Hamel-Rizzie, Plattsburgh

"I feel a traffic light would be the smarter and safer idea for that intersection. Many people do not know how to negotiate the confusing circle. And it is a tight fit for large trucks and buses. The traffic circle, a bad idea."

— Eric O’Connell, Plattsburgh

"We hoped for a rotary, which is popular in Maine and New Hampshire. The Rugar Street roundabout is a disaster waiting to happen.

"It’s so bad, I had to take my husband to see it. Who’s doing what? That’s the question. Can’t believe any traffic engineer would even allow it.

"Watching a big 22-wheeler navigate could probably get you a win on the funniest videos.

"That’s our opinion, and, oh yes, God forbid the city does that to the base/PARC entrance. Please send this engineer back to school before he does any more designing."

— Steve and Charlotte Mayhew

"I think the concept is good but as usual the city failed to do it right. If it were a little larger it might work better.

"I cannot imagine anyone thinking that designing something with the idea in mind that if you could not negotiate it you would just go over the curb. I have taken many drivers for road tests on various-size vehicles and some have failed because they just glazed a curb.

"Many people I’ve talked to wonder what happens when it snows? How easy will it be then to go over the curb? Has anyone taken a plow through there?

"I live on a wide country road, and the plows here can’t even negotiate without taking out our mailboxes on a regular basis."

— Ella M. Wood, Plattsburgh

"Have not seen the new Plattsburgh roundabout, but have seen many here in Florida, where they are the present traffic engineering fad.

"Large roundabouts seem to work fine where traffic is relatively light. They are a nightmare, however, if constructed in small dimensions and/or where traffic is heavy.

"One in particular in Stuart, Florida, is commonly referred to as ‘Confusion Corners.’

"Full-service traffic lights with on-demand sensors are the only sensible way to control traffic and enhance traffic safety at busy intersections."

— Ronald R. Brooks, Major (retired) New York State Police

"I travel Rugar Street two, three times per week. I have noticed a danger at the roundabout; it is that everyone believes that they have the right-of-way. Hence, no one slows, let alone stops, for the other guy, if necessary.

"I heard that fire trucks cannot make it through, ambulances cannot make it through. Why is it even a topic of discussion, if it’s a safety concern — there should be no question, fix it or get rid of it.

"Why don’t the police take charge of the traffic safety concern?

"Another thing, examine the traffic patterns at lunch time and when school is getting out.

"And by all means do not wait till someone is injured or for a life-threatening situation.

"Mayor, you’re wrong. Roundabouts are not for Plattsburgh.

"Fire the engineer. For two reasons — guess the other..."

— Vincent Puliafico, Plattsburgh

"Other than it being too small and restrictive to larger vehicles, I think the new roundabout serves a useful purpose. I also travel through that roundabout numerous times a day including 7:50 and 8:15 every morning.

"I have not had any difficulty and have observed motorists yielding to each other and passing through without difficulty. It has certainly allowed vehicles coming out of the High School to go in any direction much faster then before.

"People have a tendency to resist accepting change before trying it out. With some modifications, it will work. However, I wonder how snow removal will be handled as all the curbs will be covered with a significant snowfall and early morning traffic."

— Roy Garrant, Plattsburgh

"Why don’t they put a traffic light instead of a roundabout? It makes much more sense."

— Jane Sweeney

"The roundabout can hardly be called a roundabout. The area is too small for a convenient roundabout, and the idea that the center area was made so the large trucks can go on top of it is unbelievable.

"Having witnessed what a truck driver goes through trying to negotiate the area, it certainly does not accommodate large vehicles.

"Please remove it and put a regular stoplight there. That’s what we should have done before we tried changing direction of travel or installing the temporary roundabout.

"Busy parents on their way to work do not have time to add this extra puzzle to their list of things to do. Thank you for the opportunity to express my opinion."

— Sue Geddes, Plattsburgh

"Roundabouts do have their place in traffic patterns; however I do have a tendency to agree with the comments made by Mr. Ronnie Rinn to the City Council.

"Further, the roundabout coming from the east to the west is less cumbersome than from west to east, which is both too narrow and too sharp.

"The comments from the fire chief concerning both the ambulances’ and the fire trucks’ ability to ‘take the bump’ and not do damage to the undercarriage is not the brightest thing he’s ever said. The object of a roundabout is not to have that happen — it is designed to smooth out traffic, not interfere with it or cause vehicles to ‘go over the bumps.’

"As for Mr. Stuart Voss’s comments concerning the roundabout, they only typify the difference between academic thinking and reality. It would take a driving genius going west to east towing a boat to maneuver around that portion of the roundabout without running over the barriers. Boat trailers are not built to take the bumps like the fire chief’s vehicles. What damage would that do to a boat or anything else on a trailer?

"It seems the side toward the school is not as wide as the opposite side — did anyone use measuring equipment?

"If they are both of equal width, then perhaps that is the wrong spot for a roundabout. If you really want to see how a roundabout works, go to Latham on Route 9. It’s difficult at best to take something meant for a large area and reduce it to smaller specifications and expect it will work.

"Did any members of the placement committee ever take a traffic light into consideration. Oh, that’s right, there was one there and it was taken out? It does get more difficult when you try to reinvent the wheel. Case in point, the roundabout at that location."

— Ron Marino, Plattsburgh

"I feel strongly that the roundabout is a mistake. And I urge the removal of the existing one and also urge that no more be constructed."

— Elizabeth Kelley, Plattsburgh

"I am responding to your request for feedback on the first (and hopefully only) roundabout by the High School. It has been my experience that it has created more of a traffic problem than existed before. Now there are lines of traffic backed up in all four directions, partly because the lanes are so narrow, but also because everyone has a Yield sign so no one seems to have the right of way. This has created a great deal of confusion.

"The narrow lanes mean that large vehicles, such as the school buses, can barely navigate the curves!

"Since this is admittedly a bad intersection, why haven’t traffic lights been installed here? Why not remove the (useless) light at Adirondack Lane and move it to Angell Drive? If the streets do not line up properly, then a two-light system, such as at the Boynton Avenue-Beekman Street intersection, could be studied.

"As a taxpayer, I’d like to know who dreamed up this roundabout and how much it has cost all of us.

"This seems to be about as much a boondoggle as the downtown Post Office and Court Street backwards parking!!!"

— Barbara Adams, Plattsburgh

"I didn’t think the roundabout would be a good idea while in the making, but I’ve changed my mind! I think it’s great.

"Coming from Saranac Lake (I work at SUNY), I know Rugar Street is a shortcut to downtown. Way too many cars and especially trucks travel this route to avoid Route 3 traffic lights.

"I’ve witnessed a lot of vehicles barreling past the school and college to Broad Street at unsafe speeds. This road should be for local and school use only!!!

"The traffic circle and the college’s pedestrian crosswalks (which were sorely needed and only installed a few years ago!) make Rugar Street much safer.

"Kudos to the city for its planning and installation."

— LJ Schwartau, Saranac Lake

"This past Saturday, my wife and I drove up Rugar Street to see what all the fuss was about concerning the city’s experimental roundabout.

"What a joke! As a civil engineer having majored in transportation, the effort here would be laughable, if it were not such a hazard.

"As the Press article noted, it is undersized to fit the available street configuration. This cannot be acceptable.

"There are significant critical reasons for sizing a roundabout intersection at its proper dimensions. These include such items as the ability for larger vehicles to make the required turns and the ability to plow it in the winter.

"In a recent letter to the editor, a Mr. Rinn noted that his trucks could not make the turns without going up on the curb with resultant possible damage. Has he, in effect, put the city on notice that should he or others suffer damage in the roundabout because of its poor design that the city would now be liable?

"How about other large vehicles being unable to make the turns, such as school buses, limos, tandem dumps and moving vans, to name a few?

"How does the city plan on plowing it if the plows cannot make the circle? Will they send out a small pickup-truck plow after each storm?

"This appears to be yet another in a long list of poorly-thought-out ideas for ‘improving’ the city and unless properly sized, should, in my opinion, be immediately removed as the liability and traffic hazard that it is."

— David Glenn, Plattsburgh

"I have been through the roundabout three times since its completion and have to say each time I approached it feeling annoyed. To start with, I feel it is completely unnecessary.

"I travel through that intersection many times during a week and never felt it was a problem area. I also walk through that intersection with my dog twice a day and have never had a problem.

"Secondly, I think its design is very unattractive. I can only hope that if it does become permanent the city will keep only the new round area and eliminate all the other chunks of paving. Also some landscaping would make it more appealing.

"I have personally never come across such a small roundabout, and I think it’s a pretty good waste of time and money. I think the city could have used the funds on a more necessary project."

— Kellie A. Porter, Plattsburgh

"The Rugar Street roundabout is a good improvement to the traffic jams at Prospect and Rugar. If drivers will learn to slow down and take their time and their turn, then we’ll all be the better — at less cost and for a more attractive junction."

— James Bailey

"If the city was not going to take the time and effort to construct a proper rotary, why bother? They have wasted time, manpower and money to construct a traffic hazard.

"(The) comment that big trucks would have difficulty traversing the roundabout is an understatement — a car will have difficulty with this intersection. If the city was not going to use proper dimensions, they should have made this a four-way stop intersection."

— Verna Aubin

"I do not like the roundabout located on Rugar Street. I went through it a few times, and it is an accident waiting to happen. There was nothing wrong with the way it was before.

"I live in Cliff Haven, and I am dreading the day they put that roundabout by the base. The traffic light has worked perfectly for many years; why change it now?"

— T. Bolin, Cliff Haven

"I’ve traversed the roundabout on Rugar Street, and I think it’s asinine.

"If large trucks have to drive onto the sidewalk now to go through it, how are snowplows suppose to go through in the winter time? Also, how are large low-boy trailers that have only about six inches of clearance suppose to clear the concrete obstructions without getting stuck on them.

"Seems to me somebody didn’t do their homework.

"Another moot point, here in America these were always known as ‘traffic circles’; how did the British Isle term get adopted?"

— Paul McGee, Plattsburgh

"After living for many years in Germany, England and Iceland, as well as several areas in the U.S. with these traffic devices, I would have to say that if there is a need for one here, this isn’t it.

"Normally, these are 50 to 75 yards across, and the one on Rugar Street doesn’t meet that criteria.

"They also are normally at major intersections of highways, not on a residential street. It would be fine instead of the overpass on Route 3 and 87.

"The one on Rugar is so small you can’t determine who has the right of way because as soon as you enter it, you’re out of it. Bad idea there."

— Jay Robblee

"In my opinion, the roundabout installed on Rugar Street near the High School is one of the stupidest things I have ever known a city to do and quite dangerous. It doesn’t appear to serve any purpose whatsoever.

"This morning, I was driving west on Rugar Street, and, as I approached the roundabout, I noticed an 18-wheeler tractor-trailer trying to drive east on Rugar. In order to navigate past the roundabout, the driver had to drive right up and over part of the asphalt circle.

"I realize that there is a lot of traffic there at certain times of the day, but there is a traffic light nearby and the speed limit is 20 mph, so I can’t imagine why anyone decided a roundabout was necessary.

"Unfortunately, a roundabout is proposed for the intersection of Route 9 and New York Road, which is near where I reside. Again, what is the need? I frequently drive through that intersection, and the traffic signal appears to be working fine.

"So far, all the opinions I have heard among my neighbors have been negative, and we will look for alternate routes rather than driving through a roundabout.

"Surely there are better things to be done with our tax money."

— Gayle Hartman Plattsburgh

"What experience I’ve had with it — it seems much more dangerous than it was. I don’t know the theory behind it, but it doesn’t seem the best thing for traffic. I hope it will be changed back."

— Blanche Young, Plattsburgh

"I am in this area often with my teens, going to school at PHS and also am a member of a nearby church.

"In the short time it has been there, I have been almost hit several times. I am very acquainted with how they work after living in Sacramento, Calif., where they have a lot of them. However, most people here have no idea how they work, which makes them very unsafe.

"I watched the kids trying to cross the road — now that not one car stops, it is almost impossible for them to get across. Whoops, City Hall forgot about them.

"The only thing that is going to help the area when school is in is a good old-fashioned traffic cop for a couple of hours when school is open.

"To sum it all up, it is dangerous, and it needs to come out before something happens."

— Carol King, Plattsburgh

"Dan Stewart’s comment: ‘As people learn how to get through the roundabout it will get better.’ When the back-in parallel parking was started that was suppose to get better. What a joke!

"Who ever heard of a curb designed to drive over?

"With the streets in such dire need of repairs, like U.S Avenue, how can money be so wasted?"

— John Shortell, Peru

"I pass through Rugar Street every day. I personally think that the roundabout complicates traffic flow more so than the way it was. If traffic was such a problem, why didn’t they just install a light at that intersection?

"I cannot see how any big vehicles, including emergency vehicles, can safely go through there without some type of obstruction. I can’t imagine what it is going to be like during a snowstorm in the winter when plows have to clean the streets.

"I believe that most of Mayor Stewart’s ideas have been beneficial for the community, but allowing a traffic circle in such a small area is ridiculous."

— Carl Ezero, Peru

"I like the traffic circle!"

— Mary Mason, Plattsburgh

"I would like to offer my opinions on the new traffic circle that was recently constructed on Rugar Street/George Angell Drive intersection.

"As a full time, on-campus student at Plattsburgh State University, I must travel through this traffic circle every time I leave the parking lot where my car is kept. I do not like this circle. I think the intersection itself is much too small to accommodate a circle like this. Traffic cannot flow smoothly when driving through the circle due to its small size. Also, when going through the circle, I find that many drivers do not know how to negotiate around the circle, and I have witnessed a few close calls."

— Mallory Staples, Plattsburgh

"The intersection at the corners of Rugar Street, Prospect Avenue and George Angell Drive was an area that needed to be addressed. However, I believe the roundabout is a cumbersome and ill-conceived response.

"The simple solution would have been to change the light at the intersection of Rugar Street and Leonard Avenue to a yellow caution light to slow traffic. Then install a traffic light at the Rugar Street, Prospect Avenue and Angel Drive intersection with a pedestrian walk light.

"Instead, we have a very tight circle that many find confusing. It appears difficult to get through if you’re driving anything larger than a Mini!

"The fire department, ambulance, police and anyone driving a large commercial truck will have trouble maneuvering through the circle. I’m sure the plows will do a number on it in the winter, requiring continual maintenance at the taxpayers’ expense.

"This project, like the change to alternate parking on several streets in the area, lack a major component: common sense."

— Anonymous

"I think that the new roundabout is a accident waiting to happen. I drive through there twice a day, and people are confused about who has the right-of-way.

Why didn’t they just put a light there instead?"

— Anonymous

"If the city is going to put a roundabout in, they need to put a sign up saying the roundabout has right-of-way instead of the yield sign. They should put up a sign like in Europe. This would help cut down on near misses or accidents.

"Me, personally, we don’t need a roundabout. They should put a traffic light there and remove the one that is approximately 150 feet from the circle that leads to the student parking lot, going toward the college track field. Many of us don’t realize there is one there or just blow by it."

— Anonymous

"I don’t think the roundabouts are necessary. The area is too small. The city made a mistake in the first place in allowing Angell (Drive) to be built out of alignment with Prospect Avenue."

— Anonymous

"I think the "rotary" is a terrible idea. It is a waste of time and money. There is not adequate space for it, which makes it totally inadequate. Rotaries are practical in some areas but definitely not in such a rural area. Furthermore, I have never heard of a rotary being called a roundabout — where did that come from? I think this idea is as stupid as the parking spaces that are on Miller Street. They are backwards. I have been to many urban areas and you always pull into these spaces, not back in. Who is responsible for coming up with these stupid ideas?"

— Anonymous

 

 

 

Copyright 2004, Plattsburgh Publishing Co., Plattsburgh, NY,  Division of Ottaway Newspapers, Inc., Campbell Hall, NY. The information you receive from Press-Republican Online is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright-protected material.

 


Response Letters To Wall Street Journal Article of January 18, 2002
  
CLEARWATER, Fla., Jan. 18 - Carol Cullen had 15 years of dent-free driving under her belt when she steered a rented van last July onto a new circular intersection here. Seconds later, a delivery truck that was supposed to stay in the next lane plowed into the van, leaving Ms. Cullen unhurt but disoriented.

"THE WHOLE WORLD is trained to look straight ahead," says Ms. Cullen, who sets up promotional displays for Hilton Hotels Corp. "Now they've got us trying to stare around curves?"  It seemed like a good idea at the time. The $8 million Clearwater roundabout would replace a dangerous tangle of streets and intersections often choked with beach-bound traffic. It would create an artistic entry point for visitors.

CONFUSION REIGNS
 
But since opening in December 1999, the roundabout has scared the wits out of drivers trying to navigate it.  No one knows which cars are supposed to have the right-of-way. Some iscombobulated motorists hug the right shoulder, making it hard for other cars to exit and causing backups at side streets. The wedding-cake-shaped fountain in the center has doused windshields and obstructed views of cars rounding the circle from the opposite side.

So far, there have been more than 500 accidents at the roundabout, which was touted at its opening as the greatest ever built in the U.S. The site "has been very good for business," says James McKeever, manager of nearby Pinellas Auto Body & Service Inc, which had one of its own tow trucks hit there. The frequency of accidents is eight times higher at the roundabout than at the intersections it replaced. City officials say the crashes are less severe, primarily because cars are now moving more slowly.

It's a similar story elsewhere. As traffic planners across the U.S. rip out stop signs to install roundabouts that can slow aggressive drivers, some cities are discovering that these so-called "traffic-calming devices" do exactly the opposite. Some drivers go the wrong way, figuring it's OK to turn left into the roundabout if you plan to hop off at the first side street. Trucks flatten curbs and landscaping. In some places, accident rates have surged after the installation of roundabouts, causing them to be razed in favor of old-fashioned traffic
lights or stop signs.

THE CIRCLE GAME

Roundabout designers, a number of whom are British or Australian, grudgingly acknowledge that they have a lot to teach Americans about going in circles. In April 2000, officials in Claremont, Calif., demolished the town's only roundabout just eight months after it was installed, saying drivers found it bewildering.
 
Driver confusion at two roundabouts near Las Vegas has put them on Nevada's annual list of the worst crash spots.

In Clearwater, disoriented drivers smacked into each other or into the fountain at the an average of almost five a week. Tires squeal, horns honk and brakes screech as drivers try to make their way through the loop.

The nearby beach is also harder to reach without taking a spin around the circle. "It's a monster, and I was an engineer myself," says retiree Bernice Lazar, who takes a nine-mile detour to avoid the roundabout.

FORCED SLOWDOWN

The circles' defenders claim they are safer than typical intersections, since drivers are forced to navigate slowly. About 9,500 fatal accidents occur at traditional intersections every year, according to the Federal Highway Administration. Several academic studies have shown declines in crashes where roundabouts were built, including in Europe,but federal officials say it depends on where and how the circles are built.

"You can't just put these down everywhere," says Harry Campbell, the chief transportation engineer ofOrlando, Fla., which spent $25,000 to build a small circle and then concluded that four $75 stop signs would have worked better. "It's like art," he says of the roundabout-building boom. "It evokes controversy."

The controversy erupted quickly in Clearwater. As the pileups piled up, some drivers began adopting survival techniques that reduce the efficiency of roundabouts, like straddling both lanes at once to avoid side collisions. Angry drivers flooded city hall and local newspapers with complaints.

MISSING ARROWS

And some roundabout rules don't make much sense, including permitting cars to exit from the inside lane. At the most notorious exit point in the Clearwater circle, there still are no arrows on the pavement to point drivers in the right direction.

Clearwater is trying to turn things around. The fountain has been turned off and is likely to be
demolished, and changes to lane markings give drivers a better idea of where to aim. The most recent accident reports also offer some encouragement: 23 crashes in the final three months of last year compared with 49 in the same period in 2000.

Michael Wallwork, a transplanted Australian who helped design Clearwater's roundabout, pins much of the blame on drivers. "A lot of the opposition to roundabouts comes from a very simple bias," he says. "Americans are fed a diet of speed all the way from freeways to residential streets."

 
 Top Stories

Roundabout achieves goal: fewer accidents
By Hallie Arnold , Freeman staff 03/24/2001

TOWN OF ULSTER - State transportation and local law-enforcement officials say the new roundabout at Thruway Exit 19 is accomplishing its intended goal: reducing accidents.

"It's working. It may not seem like it is, but it is," said Colleen McKenna, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Transportation.

The old, larger traffic circle averaged eight accidents per month, McKenna said. But since being reduced from 600 feet to 200 feet in diameter, the junction that brings together Washington Avenue, Col. Chandler Drive, the Thruway exit and state Route 28 has had fewer crashes: five in the first month after the Dec. 6, 2000, opening, and only two in the second month.

"We are well below the average," McKenna said.

Law-enforcement officials agree. Paul Watzka, the newly appointed police chief in the town of Ulster, said that since Jan. 1, his officers have handled only six accidents at the roundabout.

The new roundabout drew considerable criticism from drivers in the period immediately following its opening, but McKenna says the number of complaints has decreased as drivers have become more accustomed to the new setup.

"We still get 'rip it up and put the old one back' occasionally, but for the most part, we have gotten more positive responses, which we're happy about," McKenna said.

Many Freeman readers complained in letters to the editor and in postings on the newspaper's Internet site that the roundabout was confusing and dangerous. One man even gave it a nickname: "Malfunction Junction." But negative feedback has dissipated as initial problems - including a lack of lighting and insufficient signs - have been corrected.

And there still is more work to be done, McKenna said, including road striping and the removal of blacktop from the old circle. Both of those projects should be done by the end of May, weather permitting, she said.

Landscaping also will be done throughout the spring and summer.

Besides being smaller than the old circle, the new roundabout has a lower speed limit, and access roads have been created that allow drivers to avoid the roundabout altogether if traveling only from one spoke to the next.


©Daily Freeman 2004
  Reader Opinions
Post your opinion and share your thoughts with other readers!
 Name: Antoinette Maranino
Date: Aug, 02 2003
THEY CAN'T BE SERIOUS...There is NO WAY a car and truck over 15 feet can access that circle safely next to each other...some great disaster is pending...lives will be lost...Ms. McKenna will be responsible then.
 
Date: Aug, 02 2003
Sure there are fewer accidents, there are probably alot less cars using it! everyone is scared to death of meeting a truck in the middle! I know alot of people who simply will not use it! I bet sawkill rd. has seen alot more traffic since the "junction " opened.
 
Number of Opinions: 10

See all 10 reader opinions...



 


 

 © St. Petersburg Times

published August 1, 2000

Letters to the Editors

Roundabouts' problems can be smoothed out 


Editor's note: Today's letters are from readers who have suggestions about the roundabout, or traffic circle, with a large fountain in the middle that now greets visitors to Clearwater Beach.

I've only lived and worked at Clearwater Beach since 1983, so I must rely on old newspaper articles and editorials about how bad traffic jams were before then, but I know what it has been like since 1983, and I know that more cars are getting to the beach faster with the roundabout than was the case previously.

And I know that I get where I'm going faster than I did before the roundabout. In terms of movement, it delivers as promised.

The trade-off, unfortunately, has been a startling number of fender benders, and without question that situation must be adressed.

Since we cannot do anything about the small but frightening group of drivers who seem to believe that the world does in fact revolve around them and that they must therefore have the right of way onto, within and out of the roundabout, we must do something about the design and operation of the roundabout itself.

I think it is safe to say that many if not most of the accidents occur when someone exits from the inside (left) lane and either hits or is hit by someone going round in the outside (right) lane.

I have yet to locate a single other place in Clearwater (or anywhere for that matter) where it is accepted practice to turn across traffic without an approving sign or light, but this is supposed to work on the roundabout? I don't think so.

Either the right lane must turn right, or the inside l