|
|
|
ABOUT KNGG
June 12, 2003 – Planning Board starts review of Widewaters’ SDEISJune 15, 2003 – KNGG received authorization from the Postal Service to be able to send bulk mail on a discounted not-for-profit rate.June 18, 2003 – KNGG’s president, Allen Schaefer, takes Widewaters to task in the press over false and inaccurate statements made to a Register-Star reporter by Marco Marzocchi Widewaters' general counsel.June 21, 2003 – KNGG Benefit - held at the opening of The New York Designers Fabric Outlet located on US 9 north of Valatie. The benefit was given for KNGG by John Knott, owner, who has shown how good growth works by moving a part of his business to Kinderhook and for locating it in the abandoned Empire Homes building and therefore not building another box-like structure and for not destroying more farmland. John Knott provided wines, food, entertainment and loads of fabrics to browse at. Over 100 people attended and all had a good time. The benefit was a success. The proceeds will be used for legal and scientific consultation fees.June 22, 2003 – Some Kinderhook residents have joined a group in support of Hannaford Plaza. When did Widewaters change the project name from Widewaters Commons to Hannaford Plaza? The group calls itself KRISHP (Kinderhook Residents in Support of Hannaford Plaza).June 30, 2003 – SDEIS still not complete. The Planning Board has scheduled a special meeting on July 2nd to help move the SDEIS to acceptance. July 2, 2003 – Widewaters’ SDEIS accepted as complete by Planning Board KNGG attorney, Jeff Baker, had KNGG letter accepted as part of the EIS (Environmental Impact Statement). Public Comment period on SDEIS is open till September 15, 2002. Public Hearing set for August 27, 2003 at North Point in Kinderhook.July 3, 2003 – ZBA says "NO" on Widewaters appeal on their design. The ZBA turned it down because they say Widewaters is premature in asking for the appeal; like asking permission to break a law in advance.No objection from Widewaters. They never showed up for the meeting. July 8, 2003 – KNGG Has Serious Concerns re SDEIS:THE ROUNDABOUT: No traffic signals How are the handicapped, seniors and children to cross? Who has right of way at which yield sign? How are the school busses expected to merge safely? Halting traffic at the 9/9H intersection allows traffic from side streets a chance to get out on the highways; eg. Rapp Rd., Maple Lane, Old Post Rd. etc. How will this traffic without traffic signals at each side street be able to get on the highways? EMERCENCIES: If an accident blocks the one lane roundabout, how do emergency vehicles get to a destination on the other side of it? Routes 9 and 9H are major north and southbound routes in Columbia County. Do we want to take the chance of tying up the County with a one lane experimental roundabout? With a good possibility of traffic congestion at a one lane experimental roundabout, traffic will be forced to find alternate routes through local streets. This will make for addition noise, congestion and pollution on local streets. OTHER CONCERNS: Noise Pollution Light pollution and over-spill Water pollution Conforming to Kinderhook Zoning Code Architectural standards and scale of project The visual representations in SDEIS are not representational Length of construction o mall Length of construction of roundabout July 10, 2003 – In his column in the Chatham Courier, Clayton Van Alstyne, former Kinderhook Supervisor said, "KNGG is actively fighting Widewaters and it's important for our community that they are. Their mission is to save Kinderhook from box malls and from becoming a carbon copy of East Greenbush or Greenport."July 10, 2003 – Widewaters is out of order at Planning Board Workshop. Marco Marzocchi, general counsel to Widewaters, had telephoned Marc Gerstman, special environmental attorney hired for the Planning Board’s consultation during the Widewaters procedure, to advise him that he would not make it to the workshop that night. As Gerstman is paid only when Widewaters is present, he was advised not come to the workshop that night.Knowing the Planning Board would have no consul because, Gerstman would not be there, Marzocchi turned up for the meeting anyway. KNGG takes position that Marzocchi was out of order and should not be allowed to speak. He got his way and spoke anyway. Because it was a workshop, no decisions could be made, although Marzocchi wanted the Board to commit to a planned list for the site plan review process. KNGG noted that on July 3rd, Marco’s green sticker followers (KRISHP) did not show up at the ZBA meeting. They got notice. Why wasn’t the ZBA’s attorney advised?And now KNGG notes, that KRISHP is out in force and was not told not to come like Gerstman was advised not to come. Do we smell a rat? Or is just plain contempt for the people of Kinderhook? July 17, 2003 – Report of stolen KRISHP lawn signs. Some opposition members are reporting their lawn signs missing.No Attorney, No Talk – The Planning Board has resolved that in cases where a specialized attorney is retained for the Planning Board for an application with a specific developer, the Planning Board will not do business with that developer if the special attorney is not present. Duncan’ Donuts – had shown desires of taking over the current OK Computer building at the exact point where US9 and 9H Intersection. Three months has passed since the Planning Board last heard from them. They have gone over their three-month limit. The application is closed.July 21, 2003 – Tornado hits Village of Kinderhook and parts of Valatie, Niverville, and the Township. KNGG was in the midst of the monthly membership meeting at Kinderhook Memorial Library when we were evacuated due to Tornado warnings.July 24, 2003 – KNGG commends Ed Simonsen, Town Planning Board Chairman, for coming on strong and clear at the beginning of the workshop by telling the developer the intent of the Town Zoning Code where it refers to buildings as they should be made to resemble pre 1940’s architecture. He made it quite clear that this does not mean Van Allen’s Auto Body shop because it is next door. "In the area" means the Village of Valatie, the Village of Kinderhook, and historic farm buildings in the Township and even Chatham.Belgian supermarket chain, Hannaford, sent James Cannon, an engineer, to work with Marzocchi in the presentation to the Planning Board of the elevation plans and architectural drawings. Although we may see no written contract, there is obviously a business bond between Hannaford and Widewaters. August 27, 2003 – Public Hearing is held by the Planning Board for public comments on Widewaters’ SDEIS.Over 100 people attended the hearing at North Pointe.45 People signed up to give testimony. Among them: Mark Litteken, KNGG Treasurer, read a statement from Allen Schaefer, President of KNGG, who couldn’t attend for compassionate reasons. Schaefer sighted several points of the SDEIS that are inadequate. Mark Litteken also spoke for himself, noting mall fails to meet architectural standards of the Town Code including scale. He stresses lack of analysis on noise pollution, traffic impact, light pollution, hours of operation, length of time and hours of construction. KNGG attorney Jeff Baker stresses the Planning Board’s legal obligation to painstakingly study the SDEIS and urged them not to waste this opportunity to influence the future infrastructure of the Town. He pointed to 3 omissions of The SDEIS: 1. No traffic analysis of morning peak traffic 2. No driveway capacity analysis 3. Inadequate design details of roundabout (No lighting plan etc.) Baker pointed out that since architectural plans exist, the developer‘s request for a roof-pitch variance is illegal because the adverse impacts are impossible to determine at this point. He also pointed out that the newest round of drawings presented by Widewaters to the Planning Board during the week of August 28, 2003 are outside the SDEIS and SEQR and therefore may not legally be considered. Jock Spivy read the lighting analysis of the SDEIS prepared by lighting designer Brandson, an expert enrolled by KNGG. Alexandra Spivy, KNGG Board member, addressed the inadequate consideration taken on vistas the mall would destroy. KNGG Board Member, Sara Richards , criticized the SDEIS for its contravention of the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, especially the many portions relating to scale, architectural style, congestion and appropriate retail businesses.Some 37 people spoke up against the mall. The seven that spoke in favor of the mall did not speak substantively to the SDEIS, which was the purpose of the hearing. September 10, 2003 - Allen Schaefer, KNGG President, commended each member of the Board of Directors with a letter stating that he was grateful for the way they succeeded as a team during his unavoidable absence, thus making the Public Hearing a Success for KNGG. Schaefer later added how difficult it is to get so many people out to speak. "What this board did to pull all this together was phenomenal because late August is when so many people are out of town on vacation."October 7, 2003 – KNGG Quarterly meeting brings out largest amount of members ever. Treasurer, Mark Litteken, addressed that KNGG had $31,000.00 in expenses in 16 months. All funding came from small donors. Guest speaker Marilyn Kaplan, historical architect, addressed the big box Widewaters is trying to push off as "colonial style." "It a big box with some icing," said Kaplan. "Like putting a bikini on an elephant!" KNGG attorney, Jeff Baker, also spoke addressing the membership as to where we stand in the Widewaters case and what happens next.November 4, 2003 - Board of Education is approached by KNGG member and mother of two, Kelly Piester, who asks the board to reopen their dialogue with the Planning Board regarding the safety issue concerning the mall which, if built, would be almost directly across from the Ichabod Crane School System. Kelly specifically brought up the fact that Widewaters did not do any morning rush hour traffic studies which the board should call for. The morning rush hour should interest the board because this is when the school buses are out in trafficNovember 5, 2003 – LOCAL ELECTION - HOW WAS WIDEWATERS INVOLVED IN THIS ELECTION? WHY?In an article in today's Register-Star, Joe Prout and John Mason (We are not sure which reporter was at Republican Headquarters awaiting election returns.) reported, "Widewaters representative Marco Marzocchi called the Kinderhook Republican Headquarters seeking election results, but called before the votes were tallied."Why are the results so important to Widewaters that they couldn't wait till the media got the news out? Just how much did Widewaters have invested in this election? There are a lot of questions that need answering here, questions the residents of Kinderhook have a right to ask and get answered. We do have one answer, though : If this election was meant to be a referendum on Widewaters, Widewaters lost.November 14, 2003 - The Town Planning Board in a vote of 4 to 3 resolved not to recommend the ZBA give Widewaters a variance to build a flat roof on their big box due to lack of alternate examples of architectural drawings.November 17, 2003 - ZBA Public Hearing is held. Widewaters wants to put a flat roof on their big box structure designed to house Hannaford and other retail stores. The Town of Kinderhook Zoning Code says no flat roofs. Hip, gabled and gambrel roofs are acceptable. Widewaters architect claimed on an affidavit that in order to put a traditional roof on their big box to be accepted by code, they would have to put up an eight-story building.KNGG presented testimony from three architects proving it is not necessary to go up 8 stories to comform to the code with a traditional roof. KNGG presented written testimony from Architect Kate Johns of North Chatham. Preservation architect Marilyn Kaplan spoke to the ZBA giving similar testimony. She spoke of her part in writing the technical architectural restrictions in the Town Zoning Code. In addition Kaplan advised the board that it is important to deny this variance. If not it would set a precedent for all future development and change the character of this rural town. Architect Alvin Knoll presented the ZBA with his drawings to scale showing that this big box, if built in a traditional way, could be built to code with hip roofs that would reach only 50 feet as opposed to Widewaters' drawings where the building reached 100 feet.Mark Litteken, KNGG Treasurer, also made strong points on precedence. Litteken went on to say that one member of the ZBA has written letters to the local papers in favor of the roundabout. Because this had implications that the member in question favored the Widewaters mall, he strongly suggested this member recuse himself from voting on this issue. ZBA Member, Kelly Nicoletta, admitted that she was the member in question. She said she believed that roundabouts work because of her experience with them in Massachusetts. She said she was impartial in this matter and would not recuse herself. Looking at the drawings Alvin Knoll presented, she said she recognized this traditional architecture from Massachusetts. She held the drawing up to Marzocchi of Widewaters and his attorney saying, "If Widewaters puts up this building, it should have no problem with this board!"Ten KNGG members spoke out against Widewaters big box architecture. KRFHP spokesman Bob Kramer was the only one to speak in favor of the project. In his closing statement Widewaters attorney Robert Alessi stated that Widewaters was very interested in Alvin Knoll's drawing and would return after further investigation with a more acceptable solution. --- BRAVO KNGG!!! Kinderhook historian and author, Rod Blackburn, explained the new proposed Historical District Law for the Village of Kinderhook, which KNGG supports in theory. Norman Mintz, author, consultant and pioneer of the Main Street movement tied his lecture in with what is happening in Kinderhook and demonstrated with slides. "Redefining Main Street," an article by Norman Mintz, can be seen on this web site. Go to "ABOUT KNGG" and click on "Articles." DECEMBER 21, 2003 - LaFarge Cement (MORE CHALLENGES for 2004) in Ravena NY has applied to the DEC to burn tires as a fuel. Ravena is across the Hudson River, due west of Stuyvesant. Kinderhook is due east of Stuyvesant and many in Kinderhook have Catskill Mountain views. For health reasons, the toxic fallout from burning tires could be devastating to Stuyvesant and Kinderhook.Friends of Hudson has FOILed documents from the DEC and has met with KNGG and Stuyvesant residents on December 21, 2003, organizing to fight tire burning in Ravena. MORE INFORMATION ON LAFARGE TIRE BURNING - GO TO "LAFARGE CEMENT PLANT" and click on to "The Issues" and "Tire Burning Research."
* * * |